How Canadians Search for Tech: Google vs. ChatGPT Showdown

August 8, 2025

3 Key Takeaways (Share These!)

  1. Google = Social Media Hub, ChatGPT = Expert Curation
    • Google floods results with Reddit, YouTube, and Facebook.
    • ChatGPT ignores social media (0.3% of sources!) and leans on Wikipedia and tech sites.
  2. ChatGPT Relies on Wikipedia—Google Ignores It
    • Great for overviews, but may lag on new tech.
    • Google’s algorithm prioritizes fresh, trending discussions.
  3. Niche Insights vs. Mainstream Results
    • ChatGPT cites deep-cut reviewers (e.g., SoundGuys, Rank-It.ca).
    • Google sticks to big names like CNET and The Verge.

Share this if you’ve ever debated Google vs. AI for tech research!

When Canadians look for the latest gadgets, tech reviews, or buying advice, where do they turn? The battle between traditional search engines and AI chatbots is reshaping how we discover information—and the results might surprise you.

We analyzed thousands of consumer electronics queries in Canada, comparing Google’s search results with ChatGPT’s responses. The findings reveal stark differences in where these platforms get their information—and what that means for shoppers, brands, and tech enthusiasts.

1. Google Loves Social Media, ChatGPT Doesn’t

One of the biggest shocks? Google’s results are packed with social media. Reddit alone dominates, appearing more than any other source. Facebook and YouTube also make strong showings, proving that real-user experiences and discussions heavily influence what Google serves up.

Meanwhile, ChatGPT almost completely ignores social media (just 0.3% of its sources!). Instead, it leans on established tech publications, review sites, and—interestingly—Wikipedia.

Why it matters:

  • If you want crowd-sourced opinions, Google’s your best bet.
  • If you want curated expert takes, ChatGPT delivers.

2. ChatGPT is a Wikipedia Fan

Wikipedia appears in ChatGPT’s top sources—but not at all in Google’s. This makes sense: AI models like ChatGPT are trained on vast datasets, and Wikipedia’s structured, fact-heavy format is perfect for generating answers.

But here’s the catch: Wikipedia isn’t always up-to-date on the latest tech. While great for general knowledge, it might lag behind on new product releases or cutting-edge reviews.

Why it matters:

  • ChatGPT excels at broad overviews but may not have the freshest takes.
  • Google’s algorithm favors recent discussions, making it better for new releases and trends.

3. Brands Appear in Both—But Differently

Both Google and ChatGPT cite brand websites (like Apple, Best Buy, and Amazon), but how they do it reveals a key divide:

  • Google includes brand pages when they rank high in SEO (like product listings or support pages).
  • ChatGPT often pulls from brand sites when they’re referenced in articles (like a Forbes review mentioning Samsung’s specs).

Why it matters:

  • If you’re researching a product, Google might send you straight to the manufacturer.
  • ChatGPT is more likely to serve third-party takes that mention brands.

4. ChatGPT Prefers Deep Cuts—Google Sticks to Household Names

Google’s top results are dominated by big players (CNET, TechRadar, The Verge). ChatGPT, meanwhile, includes niche sites like "SoundGuys," "Rank-It.ca," and "Digital Trends"—sources that don’t always appear in Google’s top 10.

This suggests:

  • Google rewards authority and traffic.
  • ChatGPT pulls from a wider, sometimes more specialized pool.

Why it matters:

  • If you want mainstream reviews, Google’s algorithm has you covered.
  • If you want hidden gems or hyper-specific insights, ChatGPT might surprise you.

The Bottom Line: Who Wins?

It depends on what you’re after.

Use Google if you…

  • Want real-time opinions (Reddit, YouTube, forums)
  • Need the latest product news (Google indexes fresh content faster)
  • Prefer a mix of user and expert perspectives

Use ChatGPT if you…

  • Want summarized, expert-driven answers
  • Don’t care about social chatter
  • Like deep-cut review sites

The real winner? Smart searchers who use both.

Final Thought: The Future of Search is Split

As AI reshapes how we find information, one thing’s clear: Google and ChatGPT serve different needs. Google remains the king of real-time, crowd-powered insights, while ChatGPT acts like a well-read tech guru—skipping the noise but sometimes missing the pulse.

For now, the best strategy is to use both wisely. Check Google for the latest buzz, then ask ChatGPT for a polished breakdown. Together, they give you the full picture.

What’s your go-to for tech research? Let us know in the comments! (insert text: "comment below")

This report is created by Ktau.ai, leading Generative Engine Optimization platform. Our software platform helps brands and agencies understand user behavior as discovery shifts from traditional Google Search to AI-generated answers from ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini. It provides recommendations and automated optimization so you can dominate AI search. Contact us to learn more.